mscs had mscs (PromoCell)
Structured Review

Mscs Had Mscs, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 307 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mscs had mscs/product/PromoCell
Average 97 stars, based on 307 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Enhanced Angiogenic Potential of Electrically Stimulated Human Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) for Ischemic Tissue Regeneration"
Article Title: Enhanced Angiogenic Potential of Electrically Stimulated Human Adipose‐Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) for Ischemic Tissue Regeneration
Journal: MedComm
doi: 10.1002/mco2.70352
Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic illustrations of electrically potentiated MSCs (epMSCs) and their improved angiogenic potentials.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Electrical stimulation (ES) of hAD‐MSCs. (A) Schematic illustrations of in vitro experimental procedures and ES parameters. A constant voltage of 0.3 V with low frequency (LF, 1 Hz) and high frequency (HF, 100 Hz) was used for ES of hAD‐MSCs. (B) LIVE/DEAD staining images of the unstimulated MSCs (control) or MSCs stimulated with LF or HF. Green and red cells represent live and dead cells, respectively. Scale bars = 200 µm. (C) Cell viability of hAD‐MSCs ( n = 4). Cell viability was expressed as the percentage of live cells among the total (live and dead) cells. (D) Relative metabolic activity of unstimulated or electrically stimulated MSCs. Relative metabolic activity of each group was demonstrated as absorbance at 450 nm normalized by that of the unstimulated control ( n = 4).
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Staining, Control, Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Expression of typical angiogenic markers in epMSCs. (A) Relative mRNA expression of VEGF‐A, HGF, bFGF, and IGF‐1 genes. Expression of each gene was normalized to that of GAPDH ( n = 4). (B) Quantification of VEGF‐A and HGF produced from MSCs and epMSCs ( n = 4). (C) Fold change in the mean pixel density of each growth factor produced by MSCs and epMSCs ( n = 4). CMs from MSCs and epMSCs were analyzed using a human growth factor antibody array to detect growth factor production in MSCs. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH using the 2 −ΔΔCt method. An asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Produced, Ab Array, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantitative RNA sequencing analysis. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The red and blue dots indicate the upregulated and downregulated genes in the epMSCs compared with those in the MSCs, respectively. (B) Hierarchical clustering analysis of DEGs between the MSCs and epSCs with a color scale indicating upregulation (red) and downregulation (blue). ( n = 3 per group). (C) Ten major gene ontology (GO) analysis of the genes of which expressions were significantly influenced by ES. (D) Gene expression profile associated with GO terms related to angiogenesis. Genes depicted in blue and red indicate upregulation and downregulation of angiogenesis, respectively.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Gene Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Proteomics analysis of MSCs and epMSCs. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the distribution of proteins identified the CM of MSCs and epMSCs. (B) Hierarchical clustering analysis of the differentially expressed proteins between MSC CM and epMSC CM with a color scale indicating downregulation (blue) and upregulation (red). (C) GO analysis highlighting the top 10 biological processes significantly altered by ES with. (D) Functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed proteins with the top 10 significantly enriched GO terms related to signaling pathways.
Techniques Used: Functional Assay, Protein-Protein interactions